Newsletter · · Ashutosh Agarwal

Warsh Takes Jackson Hole as Inflation Reheats - US Macro Recap - Week of August 28, 2026

US Macro Recap for the week of August 28, 2026. Podcast synthesis on the core inflation print and Kevin Warsh's Jackson Hole debut that will decide the fall, why 3Fourteen marks 0.25 percent as the line that violently reprices September hike odds, Bank of America data arguing the K-shaped consumer is healing, and the AI buildout turning into a bond-market and credit story.

US Macro Recap

Week of August 28, 2026: Warsh Takes Jackson Hole as Inflation Reheats

US Macro Recap, Friday, August 28, 2026

Two numbers are about to decide the fall. The first is the core inflation print landing this week; the second is what new Fed chair Kevin Warsh says when he steps onto the Jackson Hole stage. The podcasts this week were one long argument about both, and the striking thing is that the people who run money and the people who shout into microphones have stopped agreeing on even the basic facts. One camp says inflation is ripping again and the Fed will have to hike; another says the recent data has quietly softened and the whole bond scare is really about the deficit, not prices; a third says the consumer is cracking underneath it all. Here's the week, sorted.

TL;DR

  • Inflation is the swing factor again, and nobody agrees on the number. Gold-focused hosts say the last core PCE reading, the Fed's favorite inflation gauge, was the "worst since 2022," with $100 oil still to fully hit the data. The professional forecasting desks expect this week's print to be tame (around 0.23% month-on-month), while one closely-watched research shop pegs it at 0.28%, the exact line above which, they say, bets on a September rate hike would "violently" reprice. Market-implied odds of a September hike have already fallen from about 75% in July to roughly 30%.
  • Warsh's first Jackson Hole speech lands right into that. Reporters and desks agree he'll give a big-picture speech (framework, AI-driven disinflation, how the Fed communicates) and dodge any specific guidance. A former Fed governor went on the record saying the hawks are right and Warsh should be ready to raise; the market still isn't sure it can trust what "2%" now means.
  • The consumer split the room. Bank of America's own card and deposit data says the "K-shaped" economy, where the rich pull away and the poor fall behind, is actually healing: lower-income spending up 5.4% and after-tax wages up 5.2%, now growing faster than high earners. Other voices see the opposite: rising credit-card delinquencies, a savings rate of just 2–3%, 66% of people living paycheck-to-paycheck, and long-term unemployment sitting at a historic share of the jobless.

What's new

1. The inflation print is the whole ballgame, and the pundits and the desks are miles apart. (Pundit voices vs. sell-side desks, watch the gap.) On The Jay Martin Show (August 22), host Jay Martin argued the Strait of Hormuz has now been closed for over 12 weeks, roughly 20% of the world's oil has been off the market, oil is "over $100 per barrel and rising," and "the latest core PCE print was the worst since 2022, but the impact of three months of expensive oil hasn't even fully been priced in to the data yet." Retail creator Zach Foust made the same case with the government's own tables on The Zach Foust Show (August 22), walking through producer prices (wholesale costs) running as hot as 5.9% in the spring and consumer prices climbing back into the mid-3% range, and guessing August CPI comes in near 3.6% with oil back around $89 (versus $63 before the war). The desks disagree: on Nomura – The Week Ahead (August 21), the US economics team said "we expect another subdued print of 0.23% month over month" for core PCE. Why it matters: the number lands this week, and as one desk warns below, a few hundredths of a percent is the difference between the Fed sitting still and the market suddenly pricing a hike.

2. Warsh's Jackson Hole debut, expect a lecture on ideas, not a rate signal. (Reporter + academic.) On WSJ's Take On the Week (August 23), WSJ chief economics correspondent Nick Timiraos said core PCE "has been above 2% for five plus years," that three Fed officials dissented in July because they wanted to raise rates, and that Warsh has made clear "2.0 percent inflation is our target" while also saying the Fed "focuses too much on the right side of the decimal point", leaving markets unsure whether 2.5% would quietly be "good enough." Columbia's Frederick Mishkin, a former Fed governor, sided with the hawks:

There is nothing right now... the economy does not have slack. We're at full employment. It's true that the job growth is weak. But again, we've shrunk the labor force because of all this issues of immigration.

Timiraos expects a "30,000 foot" framework speech, not a playbook; Nomura agrees Warsh will stress his "reform agenda," the balance sheet, "productivity-led disinflation from AI," and communication, while holding rates indefinitely. Why it matters: if Warsh gives markets no reaction function and the inflation print runs hot, the burden of "doing the Fed's work" falls back on the bond market, meaning higher yields.

3. The consumer debate cracked wide open, and Bank of America says the K is healing. (Data-driven, both sides.) On The Money Alchemist Podcast (August 22), the hosts cited a Bank of America Institute note (August 16): "spending growth is no longer K shaped. Importantly, the gap closed because lower income households spending growth accelerated to 5.4% year over year," with after-tax wage growth for that group accelerating to 5.2%, faster than higher-income households. On Lagniappe (August 21), the Stokes brothers backed that up with retail earnings (Target beat and raised, Home Depot beat) and noted real wages from 2019–2023 rose about 9% a year for the bottom fifth of earners while the top fifth went negative, "the consumer is still quite strong." The opposite view came from Henrik Zeberg on Palisades Gold Radio (August 21): delinquencies rising on credit cards, up to "66 percent... living paycheck to paycheck," a savings rate "between 2% to 3%," and the housing market, about 20% of the economy, "completely at rock bottom." Why it matters: whether the low-end consumer is bouncing back or breaking down decides how much slack the Fed actually has.

4. Beneath the 4.1% unemployment rate, being out of work is getting stickier. (Reporting + operator data point.) On Marketplace (August 21), host Kai Ryssdal noted that while the July unemployment rate was a historically healthy 4.1%, "more than a quarter of everybody who is out of work right now has been looking for a job for at least 27 weeks", the official definition of long-term unemployed, even though benefits typically last only 26 weeks (12 in some states). The episode featured people unemployed for a year or more raiding 401(k)s and taking bar shifts, with one labor expert calling it "a kind of historic position in terms of how many people are long-term unemployed." That squares with a data point from allocator Emily Roland on Bloomberg Surveillance (August 21): "we lost 23,000 jobs last month." Why it matters: hiring has frozen even where layoffs haven't spiked, the kind of quiet softening that can turn the labor market before the headline rate moves.

5. The AI buildout is now a bond-market and credit story, not just a stock story. (Explainer + analyst.) On The Journal. (August 21), the hosts explained that companies are issuing the largest amount of corporate debt on record to fund data centers, so "it's no longer just the federal government asking to borrow your money. It's Silicon Valley also asking to borrow your money", an investor can now skip a 4% Treasury for a "7% AI bond," which pushes all yields up. On Eurodollar University (August 21), Jeff Snider dug into NVIDIA's "hidden debt risk": much of the buildout is financed through off-balance-sheet vehicles (SPVs) that lend to NVIDIA's customers using the chips as collateral, with NVIDIA quietly guaranteeing that collateral's value, making NVIDIA "the gray swan" that entangles everyone if the credit cycle turns. He flagged that "non-accrual" loans (a step short of a written-off loss) are "creeping up... pretty quickly in certain funds," and that a software-company refinancing wall is coming. Peter Boockvar added the market's own warning sign on The David Lin Report (August 21): the spread on the lowest-rated (triple-C) junk bonds "has widened out to above where it was the Liberation Day last year... a big yellow flag." Why it matters: the same AI spending propping up growth is now a channel through which higher rates could bite.

The debate

The fight is no longer "will the Fed hike in September?" It's what the whole picture means, and it splits three ways. The tell this week: the people actually running money were calm and divided, while the loudest crisis calls came from commentators.

Camp A, resilient economy; a hold is fine (the operators, backed by data). The steel-man: growth is holding, the consumer is stronger than the vibes, and the recent bond scare isn't even about inflation. On Bloomberg Surveillance (August 21), John Hancock's Emily Roland made the sharpest version: inflation breakevens (the bond market's own inflation forecast) "started the year at 2.25 and we're the same at 2.27 right now," the economic surprise index has rolled over, "we lost 23,000 jobs last month," and PPI, CPI and retail sales all softened, so the yield spike "comes down to sentiment... everybody hates bonds right before they love them again." BMO's Harsh Kumar, on Closing Bell (August 21), said the economy is "staying pretty strong," with a "definite turn in industrial" and automotive and AI demand "exceptionally strong." And the Bank of America consumer data on The Money Alchemist Podcast is the fundamental underpinning. The soft spot: this camp needs the inflation print to cooperate.

Camp B, inflation is reheating; the Fed should be hiking (academics, market pricing, pundits). The steel-man: oil, tariffs and war are pushing prices up while the economy is at full employment, so a Fed that's missed 2% for five years has no excuse to wait. Frederick Mishkin on WSJ's Take On the Week says the hawks "have it right." The market still prices a meaningful chance of a hike, and on Closing Bell 3Fourteen Research's Warren Pies called September "a coin flip... a very live meeting," warning his PCE nowcast is at 0.28% and "anything above 0.25%, I think you're going to see a violent repricing of these odds." The pundits, Jay Martin and Zach Foust, sit here loudly. The soft spot: even members of this camp concede a hike wouldn't fix an inflation driven by oil and a shrinking labor force.

Camp C, a fragile, debt-soaked economy that ends in easing (mostly commentators). The steel-man: the yield spike is about the deficit, not prices, the consumer is cracking, and the endgame is the government printing to hold it together. Peter Boockvar on The David Lin Report agrees breakevens are "relatively benign", the rise is "real rates" on debt and deficit fears, and thinks "long rates continue to head higher... eventually a problem for the equity market," with the Fed ultimately forced into "QE or yield curve control." Michael Oliver, on Palisades Gold Radio (August 22), calls it "a government bond crisis... they're going to print, print, print. They have no choice." Henrik Zeberg on Palisades Gold Radio sees "demand destruction" and a recession "worse than 2008" ahead, though, notably, he pushes back on the stagflation label: "you do not have stagflation at 3.5% inflation rate... and you do not have stagflation if the unemployment numbers are at 4.1%." The soft spot: this is the camp of forecasts and crash calls, not of people currently positioned for it in size.

The trades in play

Instrument-level positioning was concrete this week and clustered on three ideas: get out of long-dated bonds, own commodities and hard assets, and lean on a weaker dollar. Money-runners are separated from commentators.

Operators (positioning real money):

  • Own commodities and short-duration; buy international and emerging markets on a weaker dollar (Peter Boockvar, One Point BFG). On The David Lin Report (August 21), Boockvar says his portfolio is already "about a third in commodities, commodity stocks," stays "US short duration" in bonds, and owns "international stocks and international bonds, particularly in emerging markets" that benefit from a weaker dollar. His newest theme: agriculture is breaking out, the Bloomberg Agriculture Index is "at its highest level since May 2024", and a fertilizer squeeze should push crop prices higher into next year.
  • Stay invested; own tech plus the "picks and shovels" (Emily Roland, John Hancock/Manulife). On Bloomberg Surveillance (August 21), Roland is overweight technology but has been "going downstream" into industrials and utilities, "the picks and shovels around the AI buildout", where "the earnings bar is easier," and treats the weaker dollar as a "risk-on catalyst" and bonds as the "most hated" asset about to be loved again.
  • De-risk equities into the macro window (Warren Pies, 3Fourteen Research). On Closing Bell (August 21), Pies, overweight stocks since mid-April, says "this is a window where you want to neutralize and start de-risking a little bit," citing Jackson Hole, the PCE print and a slight uptick in AI compute availability (a sign of "weakening compute demand," which he still reads as benign).
  • The options desks are hedging bonds and reaching for gold. Also on Closing Bell, CBOE's Oliver Renick reported traders bought "10 times more puts than calls" on 10-year Treasury note futures and 10-to-1 puts over calls on high-yield bond ETF HYG, while in gold, 440,000 GLD calls traded versus 150,000 puts, with the fund "on a 14% run this month."
  • Semiconductors, NVIDIA as top pick (Harsh Kumar, BMO). On Closing Bell, BMO initiated the chip group at Outperform with NVIDIA the "de facto leader," and is bullish on analog chipmakers tied to an industrial and auto upturn.

Commentators (a stated view):

  • Own the miners over gold itself; silver is the most explosive (Michael Oliver, MSA). On Palisades Gold Radio (August 22), Oliver's "table-pounding" call is that gold and silver miners are historically cheap versus gold and set to "double or more" relative to it, with gold potentially "$8,000 to $9,000" and silver "$500 or so." He's "bearish on U.S. government bonds" but won't short them, and warns that bank and financial ETFs (KBE, XLF) are breaking momentum supports, a possible first domino.
  • Dollar-cost-average into gold now (Henrik Zeberg). On Palisades Gold Radio (August 21), Zeberg is "actually starting to buy gold now physically," seeing $25,000–$30,000 an ounce "five, six, seven years down the road," but warns a dollar rally in the first leg of a downturn is a near-term headwind for gold.
  • Hold hard assets and index funds; the Fed will reflate (Zach Foust). On The Zach Foust Show (August 22), the message is gold and silver "as the insurance policy against the weakness of the dollar," plus index funds and housing, "hold, hold, hold" on the view that "if things collapse, they'll print money."
  • Don't fight the weak-dollar policy (MUFG). On The MUFG Global Markets Podcast (August 21), Derek Halpenny noted the dollar fell "nearly 3%" over four weeks, the biggest such drop "since the period after Liberation Day, 2025", reads it as the administration quietly wanting a weaker dollar, and is skeptical Treasury Secretary Bessent can deliver real fiscal consolidation ("tinkering around the edges").

Read-throughs

  • AI capex has become a bond-market variable. The debt-funded buildout described on The Journal. competes directly with the Treasury for savings, and the off-balance-sheet plumbing on Eurodollar University means a credit-cycle downturn wouldn't stay contained. Boockvar's widening triple-C spreads on The David Lin Report are the first place that would show up.
  • Food is shaping up as the next inflation leg. Boockvar's ag-breakout call, plus his point that farmers priced out of fertilizer means weaker future harvests, matters because, as he put it, restaurants and grocers "raise prices and then" rarely lower them. Dan Altman made the same warning about a cold winter spiking heating-oil and diesel on Retail Unwrapped - from The Robin Report (August 21), where he also pegged inflation "still in that 3.5% range" and named tariffs, the Iran war and the AI construction boom as three unusual price-pushers.
  • The dollar is the pressure-release valve, and it cuts both ways. A weaker dollar is Emily Roland's reason to stay invested, but MUFG flags the flip side: it re-imports inflation and could nudge foreign holders, still roughly 30% of the Treasury market per Boockvar, to sell.
  • Immigration is quietly holding the unemployment rate down. Mishkin's point on WSJ's Take On the Week, that weak job growth coexists with full employment because "we've shrunk the labor force" via immigration, is the break-even-payrolls story in plain sight: with fewer new workers arriving, the economy needs far fewer new jobs each month just to keep unemployment flat. That makes a low headline rate (4.1%) less reassuring than it looks, and it dovetails with the long-term-unemployment spike on Marketplace.

What changed

Tuesday's recap ("The Debasement Trade Goes Vertical Into Jackson Hole") ended with the market having bought hard assets, the pros doubting the Treasury's buyback, and everyone waiting on Warsh. Since then:

  • Inflation moved from a measurement story to a data event. Last week's new angle was the government quietly changing how it calculates PCE. This week the argument moved to the actual number, a hot last print (per the pundits) versus desks expecting a tame one (~0.23%), with the report landing now, right at Jackson Hole, and one desk marking 0.25% as the line that flips September-hike odds.
  • Jackson Hole arrived. Warsh's debut went from "imminent" to here, and the expectation firmed up: a framework speech with no forward guidance, while a former Fed governor publicly argued he should be readier to raise.
  • The consumer debate flipped open. The consumer barely featured last week. This week Bank of America's data (the "K" healing, low-end spending and wages up over 5%) collided head-on with the delinquency-and-paycheck-to-paycheck crowd. It's genuinely two-sided now.
  • The bond-selloff diagnosis got sharper. Last week's frame was "the buyback is too small." This week the pros pinned down why yields are up: real rates and fiscal/sentiment forces, not inflation expectations (breakevens are flat, per both Roland and Boockvar), which matters, because a rate hike wouldn't fix a deficit problem.
  • Dollar weakness became the tell. Down about 3% in four weeks, the biggest drop since Liberation Day, now read across desks as a deliberate policy lean rather than an accident.